Despite the consequences of fire being largely borne by low- and middle-income countries, especially in rapidly developing cities, fire safety systems (policies, infrastructure, institutions, public education, etc.) are severely lacking and not fit for purpose in many cities. The same could be said for much of the humanitarian sector. There is a dire need and opportunity to expand and strengthen capacities, not only for fire response, but for the design, management, and use of the built environment and in relation to education and economic activities, both formal and informal. Kindling aims to promote fire safety development by supporting institutions, partner organizations and communities through research, advocacy, education & training, pilot projects, and eventually through the development of long term programs
Research
Expanding and sharing the breadth and depth of knowledges related to fire safety inequalities and systematically identifying opportunities to improve fire safety
Advocacy
Promoting institutionalization of appropriate fre safety policies and practices into existing systems of urban development, disaster risk reduction, and humanitarian assistance
Learning
Capacity building of communities vulnerable to fire and of practitioners and authorities who engage with, and may infuence fire safety of vulnerable populations
Pilot Projects
Exploring what works and what doesn’t by bringing theory into practice, through co-design and
implementation of fire safety projects with vulnerable communities and key partners
Diversifying fire risk and safety
governance in informal settlement
In informal settlements fire risk arises from unequal urbanisation where fire hazards and socio-economic vulnerabilities create and reinforce each other, and from a lack of recognition of diversity within the system. Recognising this complexity as an injustice, we argue emergent informal safety practices and systems could shape better policy and interventions. Major findings:
1. Recognising and incorporating the spectrum and diversity of experiences and conditions is vital for complex systems approaches
2. Within a complex system, risk can result from numerous ‘failures’ in the system. Building on ‘listening to diverse voices’, we look critically at how failure may be defined differently by different actors in the system, ‘whose reality counts?’, who learns what from whom, and what needs to happen for learning for safety to go beyond performative commitments ‘to learn’
3. A key feature of complex systems is their openness/permeable boundaries, which we consider here in terms of how fire risk and safety is influenced by political economy and governance decisions at different levels which flow from this
Click image to download report!
State of the Field Review - Fire Safety in Humanitarian Settings
Baseline Fire Safety Assessment:
Marketplaces in Hargeisa, Somaliland
This report shares the findings and recommendations from a baseline fire safety assessment of marketplaces in Hargeisa, Somaliland carried out by Kindling, and commissioned by the British Office, Hargeisa. The assessment was carried out in response to the fire that devastated Waheen marketplace on 1 April 2022.
Following a review of available literature, the Kindling team visited Hargeisa in May 2022 and conducted a series of interviews with government bodies, fire services, non-governmental organisations, and civil society organisations. The team also visited Waheen Market, Gobanimo Market, and the State House Internally Displaced Persons
(IDP) Camp.
​
The assessment looks at fire risks in marketplaces across Hargeisa, taking into account existing fire safety systems and cultures, and opportunities and barriers to reducing fire risk. It recommends a number of strategic risk reduction measures to improve fire safety and reduce the likelihood of another fire of the scale experienced at Waheen.
Click image to download report!
A comparative study of fire risk emergence in informal settlements in Dhaka and Cape Town
Catastrophic fires are frequent in informal settlements around the world, where one billion people live. A complex adaptive systems framework is developed to untangle the emergence and manifestation of fire risk. Insights from case study analysis in Dhaka, Bangladesh and Cape Town, South Africa reveal the importance of interdisciplinarity, broad participation, and systems mapping when addressing safety of complex systems.
This project was supported by the Royal Academy of Engineering and the Lloyd’s Register Foundation under the “Safer Complex Systems – Call for Case Studies – Stage 1B (Research) scheme” Comparative study of fire risk emergence in informal settlements in Dhaka and Cape Town.
Click image to download report!
The Invisible US Fire Problem
Often thought to be a feature of development in rapidly urbanizing Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), the phenomenon of fire among populations living in ‘slum conditions’ is a feature of American cities, and across the spectrum from urban areas to rural areas.
But news headlines seldom tell the stories of people living in these conditions suffering disproportionately from fire. Reframing this issue through a regulatory lens can offer new perspectives – what are the stories of fire in under-regulated buildings and the fire challenges related to homelessness, especially in unregulated and non-sheltered conditions?
This report outlines what we know and do not yet know about the interactions between regulatory blind spots, ambiguous application of existing fire safety regulatory regimes and informality in the US. By defining and framing these matters, this work aims to discover the breadth and depth of research and action needed to understand and ultimately address fire safety issues of insecurely and vulnerably sheltered populations in the US – the invisible US fire problem.